# 12 Best Contract Management Software Platforms in 2026 - Source: https://procuretechguide.com/contracts/best-contract-management-software/ - Publisher: Procure Tech (procuretechguide.com) - Byline: Contracts & Supplier Desk (a Procure Tech desk; a team label, not an individual) - Published: 2026-11-07 - Updated: 2026-11-09 - Facts last verified: 2026-10-31 - How we rank: https://procuretechguide.com/how-we-rank/ ## Short answer Icertis is the best contract management software for most enterprise procurement teams in 2026, scoring 8.4 out of 10, followed by Sirion (8.3) and Ironclad (8.2). Concord and ContractWorks are the only platforms here with public prices, from $499 and $425 a month. ## Key takeaways - Icertis (8.4), Sirion (8.3) and Ironclad (8.2) lead our contract management software ranking. - After-signature tracking of renewals and obligations carries the most weight, because that is where value leaks. - Only Concord ($499/mo) and ContractWorks ($425/mo) publish list prices. - Icertis, Sirion and Docusign CLM name SAP Ariba links; Ironclad, SpotDraft and Docusign CLM name Coupa. A supplier contract renews itself for three more years because the notice window closed in March and nobody owned it. That is the failure contract management software exists to prevent. Signing is the easy part. The hard part is the record after signature: who owns it, what it obliges, and when it must be acted on. We ranked 12 contract management software platforms on five weighted criteria: after-signature tracking (30), procurement fit (25), authoring and review (20), time to value (15) and pricing clarity (10). Facts come from vendor home, product, procurement, integration and pricing pages read on October 31, 2026. Our [scoring rules](https://procuretechguide.com/how-we-rank/) are public, and more guides sit in the [contract management hub](https://procuretechguide.com/topics/contract-management/). ## What is the best contract management software in 2026? Icertis is the best contract management software for most enterprise procurement teams in 2026, scoring 8.4 out of 10 for tracking obligations, renewals and supplier commitments after signature. Sirion (8.3) is close behind on obligation tracking, and Ironclad (8.2) suits teams that want the friendliest authoring and review. | # | Platform | What it is | Best for | Score | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | Icertis | Enterprise contract intelligence platform | Large supplier portfolios, especially on SAP Ariba | 8.4 | | 2 | Sirion | AI-native CLM with obligation tracking | Service contracts where performance must be measured | 8.3 | | 3 | Ironclad | AI CLM with review and intake agents | Procurement teams reviewing a lot of vendor paper | 8.2 | | 4 | Agiloft | No-code CLM with Astra AI | Teams that need custom workflows and many connectors | 8.0 | | 5 | Docusign CLM | CLM tied to Docusign eSignature | Companies already standardized on Docusign | 7.9 | | 6 | SAP Ariba Contracts | Contract module inside SAP Ariba | SAP Ariba customers who want one system | 7.8 | | 7 | Conga CLM | CLM with Word and Google Docs authoring | Teams that negotiate in Word against a playbook | 7.8 | | 8 | LinkSquares | CLM with a renewals and obligations view | Legal and procurement sharing one repository | 7.5 | | 9 | Concord | Self-serve CLM with published plans | Mid-size teams that want a list price | 7.4 | | 10 | Juro | Browser-native contract platform | Fast-moving teams with high contract volume | 7.3 | | 11 | SpotDraft | CLM with a native Coupa workflow | Coupa customers starting contracts from requests | 7.2 | | 12 | ContractWorks | Secure repository with alerts | Teams that mostly need storage and reminders | 7.0 | The 12 best contract management software platforms at a glance. Scores are out of 10 on five weighted criteria. Facts from vendor pages checked October 31, 2026. Our pick **Icertis** Icertis has the deepest after-signature story for procurement. Its [procurement page](https://www.icertis.com/solutions/departmental-solutions/procurement/) covers supplier obligations, milestones, renewals, service levels and commercial commitments. Its [Vera Obligations](https://www.icertis.com/products/operate/vera-obligations/) module sends alerts to owners, and its [SAP Ariba page](https://www.icertis.com/solutions/ariba/) links sourcing projects to the contracts they produce. ## Which kind of contract management software do you need? Most teams need one of three kinds: an enterprise CLM that governs every contract type (Icertis, Sirion, Ironclad, Agiloft, Docusign CLM, Conga), the contract module inside their source-to-pay suite (SAP Ariba Contracts), or a lighter platform built for speed and a clear price (LinkSquares, Concord, Juro, SpotDraft, ContractWorks). Our [contract lifecycle management software guide](https://procuretechguide.com/contracts/contract-lifecycle-management-software/) explains how those shapes differ. For enterprise head-to-heads, see [Icertis vs Ironclad vs Sirion](https://procuretechguide.com/contracts/icertis-vs-ironclad-vs-sirion/) and [Agiloft vs Icertis vs Ironclad](https://procuretechguide.com/contracts/agiloft-vs-icertis-vs-ironclad/). For AI review depth, see our [AI contract management software](https://procuretechguide.com/contracts/best-ai-contract-management-software/) ranking. Match the tool to the failure | The failure you keep seeing | Lean toward | The question to ask | | --- | --- | --- | | Auto-renewals slip past the notice date | Icertis, Conga, ContractWorks | Who gets the alert, and how far ahead | | Suppliers miss SLAs and nobody notices | Sirion, Icertis | How an obligation links to the clause and the invoice | | Legal is the bottleneck on vendor paper | Ironclad, Conga, Agiloft | What the AI flags and who approves the fallback | | Contracts live outside your S2P suite | SAP Ariba Contracts, Icertis, SpotDraft | Which fields sync back to the suite | | Nobody can find the signed copy | ContractWorks, LinkSquares, Juro | How old contracts get migrated and tagged | | Budget needs a price before a demo | Concord, ContractWorks | What the next user or plan costs | A quick way to place each platform. Based on vendor pages checked October 31, 2026. ## What the record holds A contract record is only useful if each field has an owner and a source. Ask every vendor to show these fields on a real supplier agreement, in writing, before you sign. | Field | Who owns it | Where it comes from | | --- | --- | --- | | Counterparty and legal entity | Procurement | Supplier master in your ERP or S2P suite | | Effective date, term and expiry | Contract owner | Extracted from the signed document | | Renewal type and notice window | Contract owner | Extracted, then confirmed by a person | | Pricing, rebates and price-increase terms | Category manager | Contract and pricing schedule | | Service levels and penalties | Business owner of the service | Contract schedules | | Obligations on both sides | Named obligation owner | Extracted clauses with a due date | | Amendments and their effect | Legal | Linked amendment documents | | Signature and audit trail | Legal operations | E-signature tool and CLM log | What a supplier contract record should hold, with an owner and a source for each field. ## How do the 12 platforms handle the record after signature? Most of these platforms say they track renewals and obligations. Fewer name a source-to-pay connection, and only two publish a list price. The matrix shows what each vendor states on its own pages. A dashed circle means we did not find it, not that it is missing, so ask in the demo. Figure 1. After-signature checks for 12 platforms, from vendor pages read October 31, 2026. ## How we scored contract management software After-signature tracking carries the most weight, because that is where value leaks. Procurement fit comes next: supplier paper, S2P and ERP links, and a procurement use case. Authoring and review, time to value and pricing clarity follow. Figure 2. Score breakdown for 12 contract management platforms. Maximum points per criterion in brackets. Icertis and Sirion tie on after-signature tracking. Icertis edges ahead on authoring. SAP Ariba Contracts scores highest on procurement fit because it lives inside the suite, but it trails on authoring and AI. Concord and ContractWorks score full marks on pricing clarity because their prices are public. ## How much does contract management software cost? Only Concord and ContractWorks publish a list price. Concord starts at $499 a month paid annually for 5 users, and ContractWorks starts at $425 a month billed annually. Every other platform here quotes on contract volume, users, modules or integrations. | Platform | Published price or pricing basis | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Concord | Essentials $499/mo, Business $899/mo, Enterprise $1,299/mo, each paid annually with 5 users; extra users $49, $69 or $89 a month | Concord pricing | | ContractWorks | Repository plan $425/mo billed annually, up to 50,000 documents, unlimited users and 10 eSignature licenses; Premium is custom | ContractWorks pricing | | SAP Ariba Contracts | Priced per user per month, price on request, contract duration 3 to 36 months | SAP product page | | Juro | Based on contract volume and integration complexity; all plans include unlimited users, workflows and templates | Juro pricing | | SpotDraft | Based on contract volume; implementation and migration included at no extra fee | SpotDraft pricing | | LinkSquares | Based on contract volume, users, modules, implementation and custom integrations | LinkSquares pricing | | Ironclad | Shaped by products, users, workflows and growth; some integrations are add-ons | Ironclad pricing | | Agiloft | Quote form for CLM (includes Astra) or Astra alone | Agiloft pricing | | Icertis, Sirion, Docusign CLM, Conga CLM | Quote based; no price on the pages we read | Vendor sites | Contract management software pricing from vendor pages read October 31, 2026. Worked example A team of 10 on Concord Essentials pays $499 for the first 5 users plus 5 × $49 for the rest, or $744 a month. Paid annually, that is $8,928 a year. Inputs: Concord list prices read October 31, 2026. Taxes and add-ons excluded. ## The 12 best contract management software platforms, reviewed ### 1. Icertis Image: Icertis home page, captured October 31, 2026. - **Best for:** Large enterprises with big supplier portfolios, especially on SAP Ariba - **Pricing from:** Quote based - **Standout:** Obligations, milestones and renewals tracked for every supplier - **Verified:** October 31, 2026 Icertis says on its [home page](https://www.icertis.com/) that the Global Fortune 500 runs on Icertis. Its [procurement page](https://www.icertis.com/solutions/departmental-solutions/procurement/) tracks commercial terms, obligations, renewals and compliance across every supplier agreement. The [Vera Obligations](https://www.icertis.com/products/operate/vera-obligations/) module extracts obligations and triggers alerts so owners act early and avoid penalties. Icertis also powers the contract intelligence inside SAP Ariba Contracts, and its [SAP Ariba page](https://www.icertis.com/solutions/ariba/) links sourcing projects to contracts. #### Strengths - Deepest after-signature tracking for supplier contracts - Alerts routed to obligation owners - Native SAP Ariba connection #### Watch-outs - No public price - Built for large programs, so smaller teams may find it heavy [Visit Icertis](https://www.icertis.com/) ### 2. Sirion Image: Sirion home page, captured October 31, 2026. - **Best for:** Service and outsourcing contracts where supplier performance must be measured - **Pricing from:** Quote based - **Standout:** Obligations matched to invoice line items - **Verified:** October 31, 2026 Sirion says it has customers across 70+ countries. Its [Manage page](https://www.sirion.ai/platform/manage/) tracks every obligation through its Single Extraction Agent and traces each one to the clause that holds it. The same page says Sirion can identify payments and penalties tied to obligations and match each one to the right invoice line item. Its [SAP Ariba integration page](https://www.sirion.ai/platform/integrations/sap/ariba/) extends Ariba with Sirion CLM. We did not find renewal alerts named on the pages we read, so ask. #### Strengths - Obligation tracking traced to the clause - Payments and penalties matched to invoices - SAP Ariba integration #### Watch-outs - Renewal alerts not named on the pages we read - No public price [Visit Sirion](https://www.sirion.ai/) ### 3. Ironclad Image: Ironclad home page, captured October 31, 2026. - **Best for:** Procurement teams that review a lot of vendor paper - **Pricing from:** Quote based - **Standout:** Intake Agent that reads incoming vendor paper - **Verified:** October 31, 2026 Ironclad says on its [home page](https://ironcladapp.com/) that it was named a Leader in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for CLM and in The Forrester Wave for CLM Platforms, Q1 2025. Its [procurement page](https://ironcladapp.com/solutions/team/procurement) turns renewals, discounts, rebates, credits, SLAs and termination rights into tracked value, with a prompt to act before renewal windows close. The Intake Agent reads vendor paper and fills the launch form. The [pricing page](https://ironcladapp.com/pricing/) names a Coupa integration. #### Strengths - AI review of vendor paper for pricing, renewal and termination terms - Coupa integration - Strong authoring for non-lawyers #### Watch-outs - Some integrations are paid add-ons - No public price [Visit Ironclad](https://ironcladapp.com/) ### 4. Agiloft Image: Agiloft home page, captured October 31, 2026. - **Best for:** Teams that need custom workflows and many system connections - **Pricing from:** Quote based - **Standout:** Over 1,000 pre-built connectors - **Verified:** October 31, 2026 Agiloft’s [home page](https://www.agiloft.com/) says it works with Salesforce, SAP, Oracle and 1,000+ other systems, and is e-signature ready with DocuSign and Adobe Sign. Its Astra AI is aimed at legal and procurement teams. The [pricing page](https://www.agiloft.com/pricing/) says Agiloft extracts obligations, automates follow-up and sends alerts for payments, expirations and deliverables. Pricing is a quote form for CLM, which includes Astra, or Astra on its own. #### Strengths - No-code workflow configuration - SAP and Oracle connections - Alerts for payments, expirations and deliverables #### Watch-outs - No public price - Flexibility means more setup decisions [Visit Agiloft](https://www.agiloft.com/) ### 5. Docusign CLM Image: Docusign CLM product page, captured October 31, 2026. - **Best for:** Companies already standardized on Docusign eSignature - **Pricing from:** Quote based - **Standout:** Over 100 pre-trained AI extraction models - **Verified:** October 31, 2026 Docusign says on its [CLM page](https://www.docusign.com/products/clm) that Gartner named it a Leader in CLM for the sixth year in a row and that 2,200 enterprises use it. It offers 100+ pre-configured workflow steps. The same page covers obligations and renewals through agreement reports, over 100 pre-trained AI models for extraction, and interoperability with Salesforce and SAP Ariba. It also lists a Coupa integration that creates or updates contracts in either system. Signature is native, which shortens the step from approval to signed copy. #### Strengths - Native e-signature - SAP Ariba and Coupa connections - Large library of workflow steps #### Watch-outs - No procurement-specific page on the pages we read - No public price [Visit Docusign CLM](https://www.docusign.com/products/clm) ### 6. SAP Ariba Contracts Image: SAP product page, captured October 31, 2026. - **Best for:** SAP Ariba customers who want contracts in the same suite - **Pricing from:** Per user per month, price on request - **Standout:** Contracts inside the S2P suite - **Verified:** October 31, 2026 SAP’s [product page](https://www.sap.com/products/spend-management/contract-management-software.html) offers authoring, clause assembly and redlining through embedded SAP Ariba Contract Intelligence by Icertis, plus a Joule Contracts Agent. Analytics and notifications cover contract metadata such as expiration dates and notification periods. It is priced per user per month, with contract terms of 3 to 36 months. Teams outside SAP Ariba gain little from it. #### Strengths - Native to SAP Ariba sourcing and buying - Notifications on expiration and notice periods - Icertis intelligence embedded #### Watch-outs - Obligation tracking not named on the page we read - Value depends on running SAP Ariba [Visit SAP Ariba Contracts](https://www.sap.com/products/spend-management/contract-management-software.html) ### 7. Conga CLM Image: Conga CLM product page, captured October 31, 2026. - **Best for:** Teams that negotiate in Word against a playbook - **Pricing from:** Quote based - **Standout:** Playbook comparison inside Word or Google Docs - **Verified:** October 31, 2026 Conga’s [CLM page](https://conga.com/products/conga-clm) lets teams author and review in MS Word or Google Docs and compare language to a negotiation playbook to spot high-risk clauses. Its [procurement page](https://conga.com/solutions/procurement) covers supplier obligations, SLAs, terminations and compliance, and says teams can stay ahead of renewals with alerts. Signature runs through Conga Sign. #### Strengths - Authoring in Word or Google Docs - Renewal alerts for supplier contracts - Playbook checks on risky clauses #### Watch-outs - SAP Ariba connector shipped October 2026; confirm it in your own Ariba workspace - No public price [Visit Conga CLM](https://conga.com/products/conga-clm) ### 8. LinkSquares Image: LinkSquares home page, captured October 31, 2026. - **Best for:** Legal and procurement teams sharing one repository - **Pricing from:** Quote based - **Standout:** Vendor history and notice windows in one view - **Verified:** October 31, 2026 LinkSquares’ [home page](https://linksquares.com/) has a procurement section that brings vendor history, commercial terms, obligations and notice windows into view before a renewal. It lists Renewals & Obligations as a capability. Its [pricing page](https://linksquares.com/pricing/) says price depends on contract volume, users, modules, implementation and custom integrations. We did not find a named S2P connector. #### Strengths - Renewal view built around notice windows - Obligations and spend commitments in one place - Clear list of pricing factors #### Watch-outs - No named S2P connector on the pages we read - No public price [Visit LinkSquares](https://linksquares.com/) ### 9. Concord Image: Concord home page, captured October 31, 2026. - **Best for:** Mid-size teams that want a list price and self-serve setup - **Pricing from:** $499/mo paid annually, 5 users - **Standout:** Published plans with unlimited e-signatures - **Verified:** October 31, 2026 Concord’s [pricing page](https://www.concord.app/pricing) lists Essentials at $499 a month, Business at $899 and Enterprise at $1,299, each paid annually with 5 users. Plans include AI extraction, deadline and renewal reminders and unlimited e-signatures. Concord says it is trusted by 1,500+ companies. Its [home page](https://www.concord.app/) also announces that a new Concord is coming, so confirm which version you are buying. #### Strengths - Public prices - Renewal reminders and e-signature included - Fast self-serve start #### Watch-outs - No named S2P connector - Product change announced on the home page [Visit Concord](https://www.concord.app/) ### 10. Juro Image: Juro home page, captured October 31, 2026. - **Best for:** Fast-moving teams with high contract volume - **Pricing from:** Quote based on contract volume - **Standout:** Unlimited users on every plan - **Verified:** October 31, 2026 Juro says on its [home page](https://juro.com/) that it powers 3 million contracts and holds a 4.8 G2 rating. Its [pricing page](https://juro.com/pricing) says every plan includes unlimited users, workflows and templates. The [procurement page](https://juro.com/juro-for-procurement) keeps first- and third-party paper together and promises you will not miss renewals or obligations. Its [repository](https://juro.com/intelligent-repository) extracts data from signed contracts. #### Strengths - Unlimited users, workflows and templates - Native signing - Handles first- and third-party paper #### Watch-outs - No named S2P connector on the pages we read - Lighter on supplier performance tracking [Visit Juro](https://juro.com/) ### 11. SpotDraft Image: SpotDraft home page, captured October 31, 2026. - **Best for:** Coupa customers who start contracts from purchase requests - **Pricing from:** Quote based on contract volume - **Standout:** Contract workflows launched from Coupa - **Verified:** October 31, 2026 SpotDraft’s [procurement page](https://www.spotdraft.com/teams/procurement) starts drafting, approvals and e-signature directly from Coupa, fills contracts with supplier data and syncs signed contracts back. It also automates expiry alerts and renewal reports. Its [repository](https://www.spotdraft.com/products/contract-repository) extracts over 1,000 metadata types. The [pricing page](https://www.spotdraft.com/pricing) bases price on contract volume and includes implementation and migration at no extra fee. #### Strengths - Native Coupa workflow - Implementation and migration included - Expiry alerts and renewal reports #### Watch-outs - Obligation tracking not named on the pages we read - No public price [Visit SpotDraft](https://www.spotdraft.com/) ### 12. ContractWorks Image: ContractWorks home page, captured October 31, 2026. - **Best for:** Teams that mostly need a secure repository and reminders - **Pricing from:** $425/mo billed annually - **Standout:** Unlimited users on the repository plan - **Verified:** October 31, 2026 ContractWorks’ [home page](https://www.contractworks.com/) says its AI identifies parties, effective dates, renewal terms and notice windows. The repository is SOC 2 Type 2 compliant. Its [pricing page](https://www.contractworks.com/contract-management-software-pricing) lists a $425 a month plan billed annually, with up to 50,000 documents, unlimited users and 10 eSignature licenses. Automated renewals and obligations, drafting and workflows sit in the custom-priced Premium plan. #### Strengths - Public price - Unlimited users - 14-day free trial #### Watch-outs - Obligations and workflows need the Premium plan - Light authoring on the base plan [Visit ContractWorks](https://www.contractworks.com/) ## After signature: the checklist Run this list on one live supplier contract during every demo. If the tool cannot show each item, the gap becomes your team’s manual work. - **Renewals:** the notice date is extracted, a person confirms it, and the alert goes to a named owner well before it becomes a problem. - **Obligations:** each obligation has an owner, a due date and a link to the clause that created it. - **Amendments:** an amendment updates the record, and the original terms stay visible. - **Supplier link:** the contract ties to the supplier record in your ERP or S2P suite. - **Audit trail:** every change, approval and signature is logged with a time and a user. - **Exit:** you can export contracts and metadata in a usable format if you leave. ## Red flags in a demo - The demo uses only the vendor’s own clean sample contracts, never your scanned supplier paper. - Renewal alerts go to a shared inbox, not to a named owner. - AI extraction accuracy is quoted without saying how it was measured. - The S2P “integration” turns out to be a file export. - Obligation tracking needs a services project the quote does not include. - Nobody can say in writing who owns migration of your old contracts. ## When your S2P suite’s contract module is enough Your suite’s contract module is enough when most contracts are supplier agreements created from sourcing events, and you mainly need storage, expiry notices and a link to the PO. A separate CLM earns its cost once legal reviews a lot of third-party paper, obligations need owners, or sales and HR contracts need the same system of record. If you are still choosing the suite itself, compare [source-to-pay suites](https://procuretechguide.com/procurement/best-source-to-pay-suites/), read [Coupa vs SAP Ariba](https://procuretechguide.com/procurement/coupa-vs-sap-ariba/), or see how [source-to-pay differs from procure-to-pay](https://procuretechguide.com/procurement/source-to-pay-vs-procure-to-pay/). ## Which contract management software should you choose? To choose contract management software, start with the failure you keep seeing after signature, then check the S2P link. Icertis leads overall, Sirion leads on supplier performance, Ironclad on vendor paper review, and Concord or ContractWorks suit teams that need a published price. The verdict - **Choose Icertis if** you manage a large supplier portfolio and run SAP Ariba. - **Choose Sirion if** supplier obligations and service levels drive the value of your contracts. - **Choose Ironclad if** procurement reviews a lot of vendor paper and uses Coupa. - **Choose Agiloft if** you need custom workflows and many system connections. - **Choose Docusign CLM if** your company already signs everything in Docusign. - **Choose SAP Ariba Contracts if** you want contracts inside the suite you already run. - **Choose Conga CLM if** your negotiators live in Word. - **Choose SpotDraft if** contracts should start from Coupa requests. - **Choose Concord, Juro, LinkSquares or ContractWorks if** you want a lighter platform with a faster start. For the wider stack, see the [best procurement software](https://procuretechguide.com/procurement/best-procurement-software/), our [AI procurement software](https://procuretechguide.com/procurement/best-ai-procurement-software/) ranking, or the [procurement software guide](https://procuretechguide.com/procurement/procurement-software/). ## Frequently asked questions **What is contract management software?** Contract management software stores contracts in one system of record and tracks what happens after signature: renewal dates, notice windows, obligations, amendments and the audit trail. Most platforms also handle drafting, review, approval and e-signature, which together make up contract lifecycle management. **What is the difference between contract management and CLM?** Contract management often means storing contracts and tracking dates and obligations. Contract lifecycle management (CLM) covers the full cycle, from request and drafting through negotiation, signature, obligations and renewal. Most platforms in this list are full CLM tools, while ContractWorks starts as a repository. **How much does contract management software cost?** Concord starts at $499 a month paid annually for 5 users, and ContractWorks starts at $425 a month billed annually with unlimited users. SAP Ariba Contracts is priced per user per month on request. Icertis, Sirion, Ironclad, Agiloft, Docusign CLM, Conga, LinkSquares, Juro and SpotDraft are quote based. Our [Ironclad pricing](https://procuretechguide.com/contracts/ironclad-pricing/) and [Icertis pricing](https://procuretechguide.com/contracts/icertis-pricing/) guides explain what drives those quotes. **Which contract management software works with SAP Ariba?** Icertis, Sirion and Docusign CLM name SAP Ariba connections on their own pages, and SAP Ariba Contracts runs inside the suite with Icertis intelligence embedded. Agiloft lists SAP among its connectors. Confirm which fields sync each way before you buy. **Which contract management software works with Coupa?** Ironclad lists a Coupa integration on its pricing page, and SpotDraft lets teams start drafting, approvals and e-signature directly from Coupa and sync signed contracts back. Docusign CLM says it can create or update contracts in Coupa. Ask each vendor to show the sync live. **Can contract management software stop missed auto-renewals?** Yes, if the notice window is extracted correctly and the alert reaches a named owner in time. Most platforms here send renewal or deadline alerts, but the alert is only as good as the date behind it. Have a person confirm notice dates on high-value contracts.